Thursday, May 26, 2011

Hue and Cry: The Success of Bridesmaids

Every so often a movie comes along that makes a good portion of the blog-o-press-o-sphere froth at the mouth about the position of women in Hollywood (for example, Amelia) and there is a sense of stress and doom applied as though this one movie may validate or invalidate female creators/writers/funny people/etc... In my opinion, these sorts of events are the things that ulcers are made of.

That said, I'm interested in why a movie like Bridesmaids gets the Hue and Cry treatment, when it inhabits a fairly clear niche in the entire genre of "lady films". Is it that the film was not being marketed in the same upbeat movie cat-fighting advertising that accompanied say: Bride Wars?



Lets be fair, Bride Wars is a PG movie with a Tomatometer rating of 11% described as "Bride Wars takes the already wearisome concept of battling bridezillas, and makes it thoroughly insufferable via a lazy script and wholly detestable characters." and Bridesmaids rates an 89% on the Tomatometer and is described as "A marriage of genuine characters, gross out gags, and pathos, Bridesmaids is a female-driven comedy that refuses to be boxed in as Kristen Wiig emerges as a real star." So, quality of script is clearly a factor, as is the ambitiousness of the boundaries of the "Wedding Movie Genre."

Lets take a sideline and discuss wedding movies in general. A subsection of the romance genre usually, there are a few highly successful and many less successful wedding movies out there. My Best Friend's Wedding, Made of Honor, 27 Dresses, Father of the Bride, etc... They all feature the event, which is one that even if an individual never gets married, they will probably attend or participate in at some time in their lives. Add a dash of the sheer complexity and expense of these events, the potential emotional tribulations that surround them and there you have a movie.






But that's just movies, there are literally networks devoted entirely to wedding shows, Bridezillas, Rich Bride, Poor Bride, A Wedding Story, Wedding SOS, not to mention Bridalplasty.

The preoccupation with marriage, the event, landing a partner, and of course, the temporary insanity that seems to descend on otherwise reasonable women, the bridezillas, is a genre that clearly has market value. Deliciously traditional with a dash of "every girl wants to be a princess" it is a "safe" genre for stories.  



Bridesmaids set out to give that genre a sharp shock.



Kristin Wiig and writer, Annie Mumolo, had a charming and funny script that was then blended with Judd Apatow and Paul Feig's comedic stylings.  
If Apatow was going to make a movie with Kristen Wiig, he made it clear, he wanted to capture the outrageousness that had made her a television star. “No, we’re not going to sit and talk,” Mumolo remembers Apatow saying about one scene of sedentary dialogue. The two female writers were occasionally wary about some suggestions made by Apatow and Feig — like a scene in which the bride and most of the bridesmaids come down with violent food poisoning. What were Wiig’s reservations? She shot a look. “Just that it was a huge scene about women vomiting” and defecating in their pants. “We wrote the script, and we didn’t really have anything in that tone, and it seemed to be such a big statement,” she says. Apatow assured her that if it did not work, they could cut it. Wiig and Mumolo — a writing partner from her Groundlings days — ultimately agreed that it did work. 
Paul Feig as director seemed to mediate the female voice and often over the top comedy elements:
From a Wall Street Journal interview with Paul Feig:
Because so many big female-driven comedies can be watered-down versions of male ones, how careful did you have to be to make sure that it wasn’t going to be a really funny girl version of “40-Year-Old Virgin”?

What it just adds up to is they’re women talking like women and we’re not grafting anything on them other than potential story points or moments. Early on with Kristen and Annie and there were other women, we checked to make sure those story points were honest – what would be your honest reaction to this? And so it just kept us honest the whole time. I honestly don’t see how you can do it any other way if you’re working with a member of the opposite sex. Because I’m a pretty feminized geek, you know? I have that point of view, I grew up around a lot of girls, so I’m pretty sensitive to that. But I don’t dare say “I know how women think.”
So, what do we see here? People of both genders thinking about what they're doing and considerately making a movie that clearly appeals beyond the traditional market boundaries of the "Chick Flick." There was also a concerted effort to describe the film in a way that was accurate to its content. It isn't a standard chick flick, but while these ladies are sexy, they didn't single out the 'prettiest' and tart her up, nor did they attempt to overemphasize the scale of the shenanigans they get up to for shtick
Honestly, who wouldn't squish down their hair in that pose?
(example mug shots of me being wrong in the comments, please.)

So, Bridesmaids' budget was $34 Million, and in its opening weekend it made over $24 Million, outperforming it's studio's estimates. Good for it. According to Deadline Hollywood the audience was 67% female vs. 33% male, and 63% of the audience age 30 and older vs. 37% under age 30."
Universal crowed: "Bridesmaids has broken new ground in presenting an R-rated comedy designed for female audiences that also plays with male moviegoers – as opposed to traditional films in the R–rated comedy genre being targeted primarily for men. The film’s bigger than expected opening puts it in the category with other sleeper R-rated comedy openings such as The 40-Year-Old Virgin ($21.4m / $109.4m)."

I was so convinced that this rare R-rated event comedy featuring women burping and farting for our female amusement wouldn't make over $13M, even $15M tops, that I promised Universal Pictures chairman Adam Fogelson that I would leave Hollywood reporting forever if Bridesmaids did the $20+ million he thought it would. Well, I've called the moving vans because I clearly have no idea what works at the domestic box office anymore.
Nikki Finke is certainly not the only one surprised by the numbers, but that is a little sad.  The idea that with the talent and energy put into this movie it wouldn't do at least reasonably gives me a serious case of the beleaguered sighs.

Judd Apatow spoke to the The New York Times about what this means to women in the industry in general.
"Sadly, I think some of that talk was true. There are a lot of female-driven comedies on the bubble at the studios and they do look to measure how well these things do, and what levels of interest there are in certain genres. One of the reasons there was pressure is because the studios knew this movie came out very well, and if nobody bothered to go see it, they could say, "Even when you make a really good one, nobody comes." But because people came, the opposite lesson was learned, which is, there's an enormous neglected community of moviegoers who want to see films like this... I think they [the ensemble cast of Bridesmaids] all deserve to star in their own movies. It is usually a dearth of scripts which hold great actresses back. Hopefully the studios will develop more movies for them. As will I."
So, unlike Amelia in 2009, this lady-driven movie succeeded. Is it a factor in the sudden increase in female created scripts picked up for the fall TV lineup? (in my heart of hearts I hope not) Does it mean there should be a corresponding increase in scripts by ladies being picked up? only if they're good. It's a shame that every time a movie with a lot of female characters or writers or dare I say it, directors must stand exemplar for all women in the business. By that logic I demand we hold all movies by male directors to the standards of Bubble Boy and Battlefield Earth.

"Women must pay for everything. 
They do get more glory than men for comparable feats, 
but, they also get more notoriety when they crash."
-Amelia Earhart

It is my ardent hope that someday that quote will truly be the hallmark of an era that we have passed beyond.

Update: Bridesmaids is poised to become Judd Apatow's highest ever box-office hit 

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

A Physical Analysis of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic



So, This is amazing, (it's awesome, it's awesome, it's awesome... the animation is incredible). I happen to be a fan of the My Little Pony.  I was exactly the right age to get the full force of Hasbro's cartoons as a young girl, and with that in mind, I have fond memories of sparkly pegasai, magical unicorns and that utterly specific smell that ONLY my little ponies smell like (something about the rubber? if you have ever smelled one, you know what I mean).
I have this on my desk. Jealous?
My little pony was always filled with sparkles and magic and friendship but also, Tirek:
(From Cracked.com
"Tirek, a gigantic half-goat/half-horse/half-man and 150 percent motherfucking hellspawn, lives in his Midnight Castle. Scorpan, his Yeti-with-wings minion, executes his evil commands, which oddly mostly consists of kidnapping ponies.

Tirek's plan involves using a powerful black magic, called The Power of Darkness, to turn said ponies into dragon slaves so they'll pull his "Chariot of Darkness" and perhaps some other appliance of darkness that requires dragon energy to work properly."
So, I suggest that we all take note Magical Ponies totally owned "The Power of Darkness" for a good 10 year period. So, while you psychoanalyze that a bit I will move on, 
to the My Little Pony of today. My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic.


Now as a My Little Pony fan, but also, the mother of a little girl, the goal of watching something together that doesn't make me want to vomit with rage or gauge out my eyes with boredom is a preoccupation of mine. This show is delightful. 


While it's obviously made for kids, it has enough story to make it interesting for an adult, and is occasionally hilarious and usually filled with action. Instead of Tirek, the story is more about balance, the power of darkness is still an issue and makes a major mythological cameo in the first episodes of the series, but the stories are overall, slightly less life or death. The ponies inhabit a vaguely greek world with manticores and cocatrices and hydras and they face some perils and all that good stuff. I heartily recommend watching it to make your mind up for yourself. 
"Cartoons for girls don’t have to be a puddle of smooshy, cutesy-wootsy, goody-two-shoeness. Girls like stories with real conflict; girls are smart enough to understand complex plots; girls aren’t as easily frightened as everyone seems to think."
 – Lauren Faust
The Powerpuff Girls and 
Foster’s Home for Imaginary Friends and now,
My Little Pony: Frienship is Magic

I can wax poetic about this for a while, but as a reference to the video above. I am not the only person who is all about My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. There is a very robust fan base of grown-ups and in fact, grown up MEN. Men who like animation who like interesting stories, and who may have sisters, girlfriends, or friends who grew up with the show are now finding and enjoying it.

They are enjoying it to the point that they are doing physics presentations about it, mining it for pop-culture references and even writing long essays about the ramifications of it's governmental structures mean in terms of political satires.
"One potential objection to an economic analysis of MLP: FiM is whether such analysis is even warranted. The economy of a fictional world may be abstracted without consequences in some stories; after all, any flow of capital in Harry Potter is insignificant in comparison to the existential battle between good and evil that is at the core of the story. However, many of the stories in MLP: FiM focus on the performance of economic tasks: crop harvesting, production of baked goods, and the maintenance of the town. Other episodes are about characters finding their roles in society. These kinds of stories rely on a plausible economic base to be meaningful. "
Oscar Moralde
Solidarity is Illusion: The Political Economy 
of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic

This piece of art inspires fascinating thought. Which should be a primary motivator in the creation of children's entertainment. What's more, it's really entertaining and I can watch it with my daughter without qualms. That is a win.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Understanding Youth- Toronto, Ontario. June 8, 2011

AFTERNOON KEYNOTE: 

Transmedia Storytelling - The Power of Connected Narratives

June 8, 2011 - 1:15 PM to 2:00 PM
ROOM: Epic (as a note, I seriously love that I'll be presenting in the "Epic" room)
The most dynamic entertainment franchises and the most potent social movements in recent years have something profound in common: Transmedia Storytelling.

Young people are no longer satisfied with being broadcast at. They want to engage, create and participate, and the brands that validate their involvement will be a step ahead of their competition. Transmedia Producer from New York-based Starlight Runner Entertainment, Caitlin Burns, will explain how to entice young consumers with evolving technologies and platforms; whether to evangelize a cause or a brand.

Learn how core storytelling tools can be used to activate and develop communities leveraging multimedia and emergent technologies including mobile content, social media, marketing, commercial campaigns, online ventures, gaming, television and film.

Burns has applied her skills to properties and brands including Halo for Microsoft, The Happiness Factory for Coca-Cola, Pirates of the Caribbean, Avatar, Dexter for Showtime and Transformers for Hasbro.
To Register for Understanding Youth, Click Here